Sermon delivered at Our House of Warship, Sunday, February 3.
I believe in the self-defense paradox:
If someone perpetrates violence against
another, there is one person responsible for that action: The Perpetrator. There is nothing that any one of us can do or
be that makes us deserving of violence.
AND:
In a dangerous world there are actions
each of us can take to increase our own safety.
For nearly twenty five years I have been
blessed to be part of a grassroots feminist movement of violence-prevention
education. Today I want to share with how
this movement has shaped my philosophical stance—my credo, if you will.
But first:
I need to acknowledge that violence will
be in the room today.
We have already turned our hearts in
prayer to Sandy Hook Elementary School. We
have invited that devastation here.
While this is not one of my educational
talks on violence, I will share some facts which may be hard to hear. Which should be hard to hear.
One of the things that we know is that
survivors and witnesses of violence are present in any gathered community.
So I want to say, before I even begin:
If you are someone who has been hurt—physically, sexually, emotionally—at the
hand of another:
I am really sorry that happened to you.
That was not your fault.
You did not deserve that.
You deserved so much better than that.
We all—every one of us—deserve so much
better than that.
[PAUSE]
Several weeks ago Sarah Metcalf spoke
from this pulpit with grace and passion on the topic of climate change. She
said,
Probably most
people in this room understand this very well.
If you do not, I suggest you have not looked at the evidence, or that
you cannot bear to believe something so terrible. Really, none of us can bear to believe
it. Our psyches just repel this knowledge. Because once you take this knowledge to
heart, how can you go on living your daily life? So that’s the first task for our community: to
help each other bear to look at the truth.
I turned to my wife and said, “This is how
I feel about violence.”
But I don’t know that most people do
“understand very well” how violence is present in our world. I don’t know that most people have looked at
the evidence.
It’s very hard to look at the facts:
That one in five women and one in 71 men in the US
have been raped.
That one in four girls and one in six boys is a
victim of child sexual abuse.
That most perpetrators are not strangers, but friends
and family known to their victims.
That there are survivors of violence present in
every gathered community.
I do know that “our psyches just repel
this knowledge.”
Our psyches repel this knowledge
because, as with so much of human suffering, it is almost too much for our
compassionate hearts to bear.
Our psyches repel this knowledge
because, if we ourselves have been hurt, it increases that injury to know that
it was not an isolated occurrence. Realizing
just how many of us have been hurt magnifies our own wounds.
AND:
Our psyches repel this knowledge
because—if we are not the authors of violence, as most of us are not—we cannot imagine how we will stop it.
It is so tempting to throw up our hands
in the face of what we do not control.
To say, in effect:
“I am not violent. I am not a perpetrator. I may even be a survivor of violence. These facts are repugnant to me. How can I do anything to change them?”
The self-defense paradox teaches us:
If someone perpetrates violence against
another, there is one person responsible for that action: The Perpetrator.
AND:
In a dangerous world there are actions
each one of us can take to increase our safety.
[PAUSE]
I am very proud to be part of the
feminist empowerment self-defense community, even if our movement has a clumsy
and off-putting name.
What I do as a self-defense teacher does
not always match people’s preconceptions, so I’m going to define it for you.
My colleagues and I teach mental, verbal
and physical skills that can be used to interrupt, neutralize or defend against interpersonal
violence.
The “empowerment” principle at the core
of our work is the idea that people always have options.
And while what we teach is far more
complex than just fighting skills, this concept is present in even the most
basic physical exercise.
Let’s say I am teaching a simple release
from a wrist grab. The student’s first
task is to face the truth about what is outside her control and next, to
identify what options are available to her.
If someone grabs my wrist, the option of
being more than an arm’s length away from them is gone—for the moment. But within that parameter, my choices about
how to respond are limitless. Rather
than allowing the situation to be defined by what I cannot control—by the
actions of the perpetrator—I can adopt a stance of empowered hope. I can take action, using my mind and my
voice, my hands and my feet, my courage and my determination.
"Welcome
the present moment as if you had invited it,” says Pema Chodron. “It is all we ever have so we might as well
work with it rather than struggling against it.”
This sermon came about when I realized that
the self-defense paradox had spawned in me a more far-reaching philosophical
stance.
If the self-defense paradox is the
micro, the macro—my credo—is this:
There are things in this world we do not
control.
AND:
We have power and agency.
Our lives are lived in the balance of
this paradox.
“Who made the world?” wonders the poet
Mary Oliver. And a poem’s breath later
she asks, “What is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?”
Call it “mystery” and “agency.” Or “God’s will” and “free will.” Or “that which we are given” and “that which
we make of it.”
So many pray, “God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can,
and the wisdom to know the difference.”
Speaking on climate change, Sarah said,
“… once you take this knowledge to
heart, how can you go on living your daily life? So that’s the first task for our community:
to help each other bear to look at the truth.”
I am reminded of many struggles for social
justice that— like the movement to address climate change—began with
individuals having the courage to look at the truth and invite one another to
accountability and action.
For example: It would have been easy for
the abolitionist forbearers of this very congregation to throw up their hands
and disavow responsibility for the scourge of slavery. They were not, individually,
slaveholders. They were not,
individually, authors of the racist philosophy that held some as more or less
human than others.
The machinery of slavery and racism was
in many ways outside their control.
But courageous people faced the truth
about slavery, and were not paralyzed by what was outside their control. Instead, they found ways to exercise their own
agency. They adopted a stance of
empowered hope and took action, individually and collectively.
And we feel proud to call them, “those
who came before.”
I am so humbled by the ways that we lean
into one another in this congregation:
By the people who helped me create this
service—far more than the few whom you saw, by the way;
By Sarah standing up in the pulpit and
asking for our help to address climate change;
By the generosity of those who serve on committees
and minister to one another and perform countless mundane tasks.
As we watch the children of this
congregation—one another’s children—and our hearts burst with love and pride;
As we witness one another in times of
sorrow and joy;
As we hold one another accountable for right action;
We lean into each other.
We have agency and power. But we need one another’s support and
encouragement to fully realize it.
[PAUSE]
Someone I love is in the midst of one of
one of those tragic circumstances that reduces life to a tunnel, where the
crisis at hand blots out all other experience.
She wrote,
“Some day I
will, Insha’Allah, be back in the "regular" world. Whatever that is.
I hope to see you there when I get there.”
I had to look
up “Insha’Allah.” It is an Arabic
expression, from the Islamic tradition.
Wikipedia told me,
Insha'Allah is said when
speaking about plans and events expected to occur in the future. The phrase…acknowledges
submission to God, with the speaker putting him or herself into God's hands….
This does not
take away from the concept of free will. One's use of Insha’Allah
indicates … one's desire … that the endeavor one embarks on will be within
God's will, which might be interpreted as that which is best for humanity, the
Earth, and all of Allah's creation. It indicates one's desire for being in tune
with God's plan for the cosmos.
I hadn’t looked it up yet when I wrote
back to my friend. My heart ached with
grief to hear of her suffering. She is
so dear to me. I wrote,
There is a
regular world out here, and it is filled with love and hope, and it is the
exact same world that is filled with trauma and fear.
I don't
understand how that is true, but it is.
There are things in this world over
which we have no control, which will test the limits of our comprehension and
endurance.
I will never
understand why humans hurt one another in so many ways.
I will never
stop grieving the injuries and losses of this life.
I will forever be awed
by a Universe that is, in the words of the Reverend Kendyl Gibbons, “always
larger, more intricate, and more astonishing than we imagine.”
There are things in this world over which we have no
control.
AND:
We are blessed with free will and
individual agency. We can make a
difference.
In a dangerous
world, we can take action to keep ourselves and one another safer.
We can live
lives in service to one another. We can
take inspiration from those who committed themselves to struggles that must
have appeared insurmountable, and who left us the legacy of a world incontrovertibly
changed for the better.
We can lean into
each other. We can become our prayers. We can live our love for one another.
What we do here matters. It is good that we are together.